ISRAELI PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REJECTS TRUMP’S ASSERTION OF IMPENDING NETANYAHU PARDON

by Steven Morris

The office of Israeli President Isaac Herzog has formally refuted claims by former U.S. President Donald Trump that a pardon for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is imminent. Netanyahu is currently facing trial on corruption charges.

Trump, speaking ahead of a meeting with the Israeli leader, stated he had been informed by Herzog that clemency for Netanyahu was “on its way,” framing it as a necessary act for a “wartime prime minister.” However, a spokesperson for President Herzog clarified that no discussions have occurred between the two since Trump submitted a formal written request for a pardon last November.

In response to that earlier appeal, Herzog’s office acknowledged Trump’s support for Israel but emphasized that any pardon application must follow official legal procedures. The statement stressed that the president’s authority is exercised independently and in accordance with Israeli law.

Netanyahu, who denies all charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, formally petitioned Herzog for a pardon in late November. He argued that the ongoing trial hampers his governance and that clemency would serve national unity. This move was met with sharp criticism from political opponents and legal experts, who contend that pardoning a defendant mid-trial, before any conviction, would undermine judicial norms and set a concerning precedent.

The prime minister’s legal challenges, which involve allegations of receiving lavish gifts in exchange for favors and seeking favorable media coverage, could result in a prison sentence and a ban from public office if he is found guilty.

Trump’s repeated public calls for the trial to be canceled have sparked controversy within Israel, with many viewing them as an inappropriate interference in the country’s sovereign legal affairs. Reports indicate that efforts by Trump’s associates to lobby Herzog on the matter earlier this year were met with explanations that the president lacks the power to halt judicial proceedings.

You may also like